Post Views: 187
Recent Posts
- Protected: 46 The Implications of Intersectionality on Southeast Asian Female Students’ Educational Outcomes in the United States: A Critical Quantitative Intersectionality Analysis
- Protected: 45 Gender, Ethnicity and Political Agency South Asian Women Organizing (book with 7 chapters, pick one chapter)
- Protected: 43. South Asian Women’s Identities: A Media and Personal Narrative Analysis
- Protected: Critical Race Theory (CRT)
- Protected: “You’re So Exotic Looking”: An Intersectional Analysis of Asian American and Pacific Islander Stereotypes
Recent Comments
- Marcela Uvario on Protected: Harassment Prompt
- Myankhai B. on Protected: Who Invented White People?
- Myankhai B. on Protected: Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler 1976
- Myankhai B. on Protected: Runyon v. McCrary (1976)
- Myankhai B. on Protected: Milliken v. Bradley 1974
Archives
- February 2025
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- November 2020
- June 2020
- March 2018
- July 2015
- June 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- July 2012
- April 2011
Mrs. Dred Scott tells the story of Dred Scott’s wife, Harriet Robinson Scott. It details her significant role in Scott’s life, the institution of marriage and slavery, and the inception of Dred Scott v. Stanford. In this chapter, Wing argues that Harriet, whose story has mostly been forgotten by legal scholars and historians alike, might have had a better case for freedom than that of her husband. Harriet and Dred filed their suits at the same time and place, yet her case was buried and subsequently forgotten in his. The chapter highlights how her intersecting identities as an enslaved woman, wife, and mother compelled the Scotts to file their suits for freedom in the first place. Wing uses bits of record evidence to draw conclusions about how the Scott’s might have made their decisions and moved through the legal system. Overall, it was a quick and interesting read that bings to light some very important facts of the case that I had never heard before. It in many ways changes the overall perception of an otherwise very well known case.
*Wing did not write this. Lea S. Vandervelde and Sandhya L. Subramanian did.
I select this one
Here is the chapter
7 Mrs. Dred Scott