Home » 2021 » November (Page 10)

Monthly Archives: November 2021

Categories

ASSIGNMENTS FOR FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5

Allen V.  National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977), p. 66. Allen, Start us off with a full-throated defense of the Socialist Party; paraphrase Justices Marshall and Brennan and Eleanor Holmes Norton. See https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/hate-speech-is-vile-and-protected/ 2-3 minutes

Sarita C.  Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions, pp. 74-75.  Summarize this reading and give attention to Justice Roberts in Hague v. CIO.  2 minutes

Danyah T. Public Forum, pp. 75-76, what are the three categories the Court has developed to describe public property for speech purposes?  Are airports traditional “public forums?”  2-3 minutes

Maria P. Permits and Licensing, pp. 76-77.  Summary of the case law in the textbook, are you concerned about “unfettered discretion in administrative officials as permitting a prior restraint” on First Amendment freedoms.  2 mins

Maha B. Intrusion and Community Tranquility, pp. 77- 78.  Summary of the reading, and, should the public sidewalk outside your home be off-limits to protestors?  What is residential privacy? 2 mins.

Alexander T. Private Property, pp. 78-79.  Similar to the public forum doctrines.  Should the First Amendment protect peaceful picketing within a privately owned shopping center?  2 mins

Denice B. Frisby v. Schultz (1988), p. 79, take 356.  Denice, present your case facts. <1 minsZuzanna K. make the argument for Sandra Schultz, 1.5 minsDenice B. make the argument for Frisby and summarize the Court’s opinion, 2 mins.

Emily SchroderOverview of Current Doctrine, p. 84-86   There are layers upon layers of issues related to the constitutional law of speech.  Give quick brief definitions for (1) content neutral; (2) overbreadth and vagueness; 2 mins. Daisy S. (3) categorization; and (4) prior restraint. 2 mins mins

Emily Sanchez. Madsen v. Women’s Health Centers, p. 85, take 356.  tell us about buffer zones?  Do you agree?  Are these zones unconstitutional?  2 mins.  Also discuss Hill if you want?

Laaiba M.  Ward, et. al., v. Rock Against Racism (1989)   Is volume restriction a violation of free expression? 2 mins

Jacky S. Symbolic Speech, Hate Speech, and Conduct That Communicates, pp. 86-89   Overview summary, 2-3 mins.

Dhruvi P. present your brief in United States v. O’Brien (1968) (focus mostly on the facts), p. 89  2 mins Annad K. List and discuss the Court’s four-pronged justification for symbolic speech. 2 mins

Xiomara V. Wooley v. Maynard (1977)  2-3 mins.

Ben G. Spence v. Washington (1974) 2-3 mins

Lesly Z.  Smith v. Goguen (1974) 2 mins

Aysha A. distinguish Texas v. Johnson (1989), p. 92  AND  United States v. Eichman (1990), p. 88, 139.  What is the difference between these two cases?  2-4 mins

Deante D. R.A.V. v. St. Paul, Minnesota (1992), p. 98  2-3 mins

Ariana L. Virginia v. Black (2003), 2-3 mins

Freshly Painted White Walls  Allen V.  Start us off with a full-throated defense of my neighbors, Jacqueline L, rebut Allen’s position, restating your professed opposition to First Amendment freedoms, free expression in particular.

Protected: Akron v. Akron CRH 1983

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Protected: Planned Parenthood, etc.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: